<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving from Block to Cloud: Emulex E3S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/</link>
	<description>a Blog dedicated to storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Graham</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-532</guid>
		<description>E3S was backup.  sadly, no longer offered as a product or concept.  look at cirtas.com for an evolution of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E3S was backup.  sadly, no longer offered as a product or concept.  look at cirtas.com for an evolution of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Consulting</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-531</guid>
		<description>this is interesting article dave , but is it a backup solution or a replication solution ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is interesting article dave , but is it a backup solution or a replication solution ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emulex E3S: Fitment — Dave Graham's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Emulex E3S: Fitment — Dave Graham's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-273</guid>
		<description>[...] my first article on the Emulex E3S Gateway, I simply relayed a high-level look at the device as well as a sample diagram of how integration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my first article on the Emulex E3S Gateway, I simply relayed a high-level look at the device as well as a sample diagram of how integration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAN Management &#124; Inside The Emulex Storage Cloud Gateway &#124; Tek-Tools</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>SAN Management &#124; Inside The Emulex Storage Cloud Gateway &#124; Tek-Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] technical consultant blogger, Dave Graham, has just spilled the beans on the project and fellow bloggers - like myself - are eating it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technical consultant blogger, Dave Graham, has just spilled the beans on the project and fellow bloggers &#8211; like myself &#8211; are eating it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing: Emulex Enterprise Elastic Storage (E3S) &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing: Emulex Enterprise Elastic Storage (E3S) &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] Graham posted an interesting article on his blog yesterday, relating to a new product from Emulex.  Called E3S or Emulex Enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graham posted an interesting article on his blog yesterday, relating to a new product from Emulex.  Called E3S or Emulex Enterprise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Davenport</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Davenport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Hi there is definitely scope for improving the interop in the storage protocol dept.  So many people want the nirvana of having the fastest Host attached disk and the cheapest offsiting of data using their IP networks.  This is a solution that looks to be going in the right direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FC is a tremendous protocol and along with SCSI has served us well for years.  But I am waiting for a fresh technology and approach that can be truly flexible and as universally used as IP so that the current encapsulating and unencapsulating of data packets/frames isn&#039;t necessary.  Is Storage in the Cloud this fresh approach?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard Netapp were looking at something that would do this, but haven&#039;t heard anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there is definitely scope for improving the interop in the storage protocol dept.  So many people want the nirvana of having the fastest Host attached disk and the cheapest offsiting of data using their IP networks.  This is a solution that looks to be going in the right direction.</p>
<p>FC is a tremendous protocol and along with SCSI has served us well for years.  But I am waiting for a fresh technology and approach that can be truly flexible and as universally used as IP so that the current encapsulating and unencapsulating of data packets/frames isn&#39;t necessary.  Is Storage in the Cloud this fresh approach?</p>
<p>I heard Netapp were looking at something that would do this, but haven&#39;t heard anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Davenport</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Davenport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Hi there is definitely scope for improving the interop in the storage protocol dept.  So many people want the nirvana of having the fastest Host attached disk and the cheapest offsiting of data using their IP networks.  This is a solution that looks to be going in the right direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FC is a tremendous protocol and along with SCSI has served us well for years.  But I am waiting for a fresh technology and approach that can be truly flexible and as universally used as IP so that the current encapsulating and unencapsulating of data packets/frames isn&#039;t necessary.  Is Storage in the Cloud this fresh approach?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard Netapp were looking at something that would do this, but haven&#039;t heard anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there is definitely scope for improving the interop in the storage protocol dept.  So many people want the nirvana of having the fastest Host attached disk and the cheapest offsiting of data using their IP networks.  This is a solution that looks to be going in the right direction.</p>
<p>FC is a tremendous protocol and along with SCSI has served us well for years.  But I am waiting for a fresh technology and approach that can be truly flexible and as universally used as IP so that the current encapsulating and unencapsulating of data packets/frames isn&#39;t necessary.  Is Storage in the Cloud this fresh approach?</p>
<p>I heard Netapp were looking at something that would do this, but haven&#39;t heard anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing: Emulex Enterprise Elastic Storage (E3S) &#171; The Storage Architect</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing: Emulex Enterprise Elastic Storage (E3S) &#171; The Storage Architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] by Chris Evans on 19 June, 2009  Dave Graham posted an interesting article on his blog yesterday, relating to a new product from Emulex.  Called E3S or Emulex Enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Chris Evans on 19 June, 2009  Dave Graham posted an interesting article on his blog yesterday, relating to a new product from Emulex.  Called E3S or Emulex Enterprise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emulex cloud storage gateway revealed &#124; Hi</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Emulex cloud storage gateway revealed &#124; Hi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] An EMC technical consultant blogger - Dave Graham - has revealed details of an Emulex SAN fabric cloud gateway [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An EMC technical consultant blogger &#8211; Dave Graham &#8211; has revealed details of an Emulex SAN fabric cloud gateway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Storage Strategies</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/06/moving-from-block-to-cloud-emulex-e3s/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Storage Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=597#comment-267</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Makes Cloud Storage Different from Traditional SAN and NAS?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Many in the IT industry seem to enjoy arguing exactly what does and does not constitute a cloud service...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Makes Cloud Storage Different from Traditional SAN and NAS?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Many in the IT industry seem to enjoy arguing exactly what does and does not constitute a cloud service&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

