<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shared Filesystems in the Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/</link>
	<description>a Blog dedicated to storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=439#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Thanks for the comments. I would STRONGLY suggest that you look at releasing it as an appliance (as you&#039;ll see in future posts from me) as this is an important first step in creating the blended private/public cloud concept!

thanks!

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. I would STRONGLY suggest that you look at releasing it as an appliance (as you&#8217;ll see in future posts from me) as this is an important first step in creating the blended private/public cloud concept!</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=439#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Thanks for the comments. I would STRONGLY suggest that you look at releasing it as an appliance (as you&#039;ll see in future posts from me) as this is an important first step in creating the blended private/public cloud concept!

thanks!

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. I would STRONGLY suggest that you look at releasing it as an appliance (as you&#8217;ll see in future posts from me) as this is an important first step in creating the blended private/public cloud concept!</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Clouds &#38; Storage: Considerations — Dave Graham's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Clouds &#38; Storage: Considerations — Dave Graham's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=439#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] a previous posting, I talked about the concept of a common cloud file system or cFS.  Some folks responded on Twitter that perhaps IBM&#8217;s GPFS filesystem (as a part of their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous posting, I talked about the concept of a common cloud file system or cFS.  Some folks responded on Twitter that perhaps IBM&#8217;s GPFS filesystem (as a part of their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Shorey</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=439#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I am on the engineering team for &lt;a href=&quot;http://SMEStorage.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SMEStorage.com&lt;/a&gt;. We actually have our product running in several virtual instances that share a common file system and which provides a &quot;virtual&quot; file system for Mosso, Amazon S3, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Box.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Box.net&lt;/a&gt;, Evernote, GMail as a  Cloud, and email-as-a-cloud. Our approach allows us to offer cloud mash-ups in which you can combine several storage providers into one file system. On top of this we have layered services and channels. We are currently considering whether to make the system available as an appliance in its own right for companies interested in mixed cloud storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I am on the engineering team for <a href="http://SMEStorage.com" rel="nofollow">SMEStorage.com</a>. We actually have our product running in several virtual instances that share a common file system and which provides a &#8220;virtual&#8221; file system for Mosso, Amazon S3, <a href="http://Box.net" rel="nofollow">Box.net</a>, Evernote, GMail as a  Cloud, and email-as-a-cloud. Our approach allows us to offer cloud mash-ups in which you can combine several storage providers into one file system. On top of this we have layered services and channels. We are currently considering whether to make the system available as an appliance in its own right for companies interested in mixed cloud storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Shorey</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/02/shared-filesystems-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=439#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I am on the engineering team for &lt;a href=&quot;http://SMEStorage.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SMEStorage.com&lt;/a&gt;. We actually have our product running in several virtual instances that share a common file system and which provides a &quot;virtual&quot; file system for Mosso, Amazon S3, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Box.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Box.net&lt;/a&gt;, Evernote, GMail as a  Cloud, and email-as-a-cloud. Our approach allows us to offer cloud mash-ups in which you can combine several storage providers into one file system. On top of this we have layered services and channels. We are currently considering whether to make the system available as an appliance in its own right for companies interested in mixed cloud storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I am on the engineering team for <a href="http://SMEStorage.com" rel="nofollow">SMEStorage.com</a>. We actually have our product running in several virtual instances that share a common file system and which provides a &#8220;virtual&#8221; file system for Mosso, Amazon S3, <a href="http://Box.net" rel="nofollow">Box.net</a>, Evernote, GMail as a  Cloud, and email-as-a-cloud. Our approach allows us to offer cloud mash-ups in which you can combine several storage providers into one file system. On top of this we have layered services and channels. We are currently considering whether to make the system available as an appliance in its own right for companies interested in mixed cloud storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

