<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Optimized Storage Solutions: Part 2 &#8211; How is content stored?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flickerdown.com/2009/01/cloud-optimized-storage-solutions-part-2-how-is-content-stored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/01/cloud-optimized-storage-solutions-part-2-how-is-content-stored/</link>
	<description>a Blog dedicated to storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/01/cloud-optimized-storage-solutions-part-2-how-is-content-stored/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=382#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Would SLA&#039;s ever come into action with COSS? I would say that the type of app/workload likely to use it could most likely never be classed as requiring stringent SLA (maybe for now anyway).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe the lack of definition of SLA for cloud to date is why Cloud is being made so tangible, once tools and architecture is implemented within &quot;cloud&quot; architecture it moves back into the dark ages (i.e. today) and back to the hosting model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully i&#039;ve not missed the point here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would SLA&#39;s ever come into action with COSS? I would say that the type of app/workload likely to use it could most likely never be classed as requiring stringent SLA (maybe for now anyway).</p>
<p>Maybe the lack of definition of SLA for cloud to date is why Cloud is being made so tangible, once tools and architecture is implemented within &#8220;cloud&#8221; architecture it moves back into the dark ages (i.e. today) and back to the hosting model.</p>
<p>Hopefully i&#39;ve not missed the point here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2009/01/cloud-optimized-storage-solutions-part-2-how-is-content-stored/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=382#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Would SLA&#039;s ever come into action with COSS? I would say that the type of app/workload likely to use it could most likely never be classed as requiring stringent SLA (maybe for now anyway).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe the lack of definition of SLA for cloud to date is why Cloud is being made so tangible, once tools and architecture is implemented within &quot;cloud&quot; architecture it moves back into the dark ages (i.e. today) and back to the hosting model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully i&#039;ve not missed the point here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would SLA&#39;s ever come into action with COSS? I would say that the type of app/workload likely to use it could most likely never be classed as requiring stringent SLA (maybe for now anyway).</p>
<p>Maybe the lack of definition of SLA for cloud to date is why Cloud is being made so tangible, once tools and architecture is implemented within &#8220;cloud&#8221; architecture it moves back into the dark ages (i.e. today) and back to the hosting model.</p>
<p>Hopefully i&#39;ve not missed the point here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

