<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atmos Foundations: Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/</link>
	<description>a Blog dedicated to storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMC Changes the Rules with Atmos Compute &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>EMC Changes the Rules with Atmos Compute &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-317</guid>
		<description>[...] what exactly is Atmos? Technically speaking, Atmos is a software product that transforms commodity servers and JBOD disk into an API-driven cloud storage platform. The Atmos offering leverages Dell servers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what exactly is Atmos? Technically speaking, Atmos is a software product that transforms commodity servers and JBOD disk into an API-driven cloud storage platform. The Atmos offering leverages Dell servers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atmos Interest.. &#171; blog.virtualtacit.com</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Atmos Interest.. &#171; blog.virtualtacit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] look at the hardware behind this offering, Dave Graham has done all of the leg work for me so lets lay it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] look at the hardware behind this offering, Dave Graham has done all of the leg work for me so lets lay it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended reading about EMC Atmos &#8212; Storage Soup</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended reading about EMC Atmos &#8212; Storage Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] EMCer, Dave Graham, covers the details of the hardware (aka &#8220;Hulk&amp;#822  that&#8217;s being paired with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EMCer, Dave Graham, covers the details of the hardware (aka &#8220;Hulk&amp;#822  that&#8217;s being paired with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Graham</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Clive,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;completely understood.  I think that historically, EMC has tried to follow customer requirements.  I think one of the biggest steps for the cluster side of the hardware platform would be blade servers.  That way you could increase cluster availability while decreasing (depending on the solution) the overall RU footprint.  does that make sense?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, (and you know this all too well) I&#039;m excited to see what and where Atmos goes.  Hardware is just hardware at the end of the day. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive,</p>
<p>completely understood.  I think that historically, EMC has tried to follow customer requirements.  I think one of the biggest steps for the cluster side of the hardware platform would be blade servers.  That way you could increase cluster availability while decreasing (depending on the solution) the overall RU footprint.  does that make sense?</p>
<p>Personally, (and you know this all too well) I&#39;m excited to see what and where Atmos goes.  Hardware is just hardware at the end of the day. <img src='http://flickerdown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>Dave Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Bearman</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Bearman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your post.  A quick clarification.  It should be stresses that since the Atmos group was driven by customer requirements, any future server vendor decisions will be based on that.  So we&#039;ve not made any commitments beyond our current hardware configurations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again for a great post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clivefair to say that hardware requirements choice will be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post.  A quick clarification.  It should be stresses that since the Atmos group was driven by customer requirements, any future server vendor decisions will be based on that.  So we&#39;ve not made any commitments beyond our current hardware configurations.</p>
<p>Thanks again for a great post. </p>
<p>Clivefair to say that hardware requirements choice will be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave_graham</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>dave_graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Clive,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;completely understood.  I think that historically, EMC has tried to follow customer requirements.  I think one of the biggest steps for the cluster side of the hardware platform would be blade servers.  That way you could increase cluster availability while decreasing (depending on the solution) the overall RU footprint.  does that make sense?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, (and you know this all too well) I&#039;m excited to see what and where Atmos goes.  Hardware is just hardware at the end of the day. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive,</p>
<p>completely understood.  I think that historically, EMC has tried to follow customer requirements.  I think one of the biggest steps for the cluster side of the hardware platform would be blade servers.  That way you could increase cluster availability while decreasing (depending on the solution) the overall RU footprint.  does that make sense?</p>
<p>Personally, (and you know this all too well) I&#39;m excited to see what and where Atmos goes.  Hardware is just hardware at the end of the day. <img src='http://flickerdown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>Dave Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Bearman</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/11/atmos-foundations-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Bearman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=276#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your post.  A quick clarification.  It should be stresses that since the Atmos group was driven by customer requirements, any future server vendor decisions will be based on that.  So we&#039;ve not made any commitments beyond our current hardware configurations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks again for a great post. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post.  A quick clarification.  It should be stresses that since the Atmos group was driven by customer requirements, any future server vendor decisions will be based on that.  So we&#39;ve not made any commitments beyond our current hardware configurations.</p>
<p>Thanks again for a great post. </p>
<p>Clive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

