<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why wouldn&#8217;t the following work? (Future Storage System: Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flickerdown.com/2008/10/why-wouldnt-the-following-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/10/why-wouldnt-the-following-work/</link>
	<description>a Blog dedicated to storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Future Storage Systems: Part 3a - Node Expansion Overview &#124; Dave Graham's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://flickerdown.com/2008/10/why-wouldnt-the-following-work/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Storage Systems: Part 3a - Node Expansion Overview &#124; Dave Graham's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flickerdown.com/?p=116#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Future Storage System (FSS), I took a general look at a basic storage system architecture (Part 1) and then went a bit deeper into some of the more interesting bits of that system from a platform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Future Storage System (FSS), I took a general look at a basic storage system architecture (Part 1) and then went a bit deeper into some of the more interesting bits of that system from a platform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
