Comments on: Seagate sues STEC http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/ a Blog dedicated to storage and technology Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:39:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: flickerdown http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-24 flickerdown Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:27:27 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-24 'Zilla, thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, 'tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind. cheers, Dave ‘Zilla,

thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, ’tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind.

cheers,

Dave

]]> By: flickerdown http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-489 flickerdown Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:27:00 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-489 'Zilla, thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, 'tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind. cheers, Dave ‘Zilla,

thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, ’tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind.

cheers,

Dave

]]> By: flickerdown http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-508 flickerdown Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:27:00 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-508 'Zilla, thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, 'tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind. cheers, Dave ‘Zilla,

thanks for the clarification on that. ;) Like I noted, ’tis the faintest twinkle of a notion in my mind.

cheers,

Dave

]]> By: Storagezilla http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Storagezilla Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:26:56 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-23 EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability. This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them. EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability.

This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them.

]]> By: Storagezilla http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Storagezilla Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:26:00 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-488 EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability. This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them. EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability.

This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them.

]]> By: Storagezilla http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-507 Storagezilla Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:26:00 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-507 EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability. This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them. EMC would not sign a deal leaving it open to patent liability.

This is two other companies having a fight and EMC will expect both to honor their respective contractual agreements regardless of how things are going for them.

]]> By: SAS vs. Fibre, Seagate’s SSD dilemna, and Sun’s “Freakin’ Laser Beams” « Dave Graham’s Weblog http://flickerdown.com/2008/04/seagate-sues-stec/comment-page-1/#comment-25 SAS vs. Fibre, Seagate’s SSD dilemna, and Sun’s “Freakin’ Laser Beams” « Dave Graham’s Weblog Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:04:22 +0000 http://flickerdown.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-25 [...] EDIT: (4/10/08 @ 1103pm EST) New entry added above on the Seagate vs. STEC lawsuit [...] [...] EDIT: (4/10/08 @ 1103pm EST) New entry added above on the Seagate vs. STEC lawsuit [...]

]]>